Ways to Drown Capitalist Hunger: The Economic Feedback Loop of Overfishing

January 2025

Introduction: The Dual Crises of Overfishing

​

Fish populations are declining, ocean ecosystems are under severe strain, and humanity is teetering on the edge of a crisis. Overfishing has stripped the seas of life at an unprecedented rate, leaving ecosystems in collapse and millions of coastal communities struggling to survive (World Wildlife Fund, 2024). Meanwhile, global markets and profiteering industries grow ever hungrier, fueling unsustainable practices that push marine biodiversity closer to its limit. This environmental catastrophe is not just a tale of disappearing species - it's a stark reminder of the dangers of economic greed. 

​

Overfishing can be defined as the removal of fish from the oceans at rates faster than their ability to reproduce, leading to the depletion of fish stocks (World Wildlife Fund, 2024). With over 34% of global fish stocks overfished and an additional 60% fished to their maximum sustainable limits, it is evident that current fishing, long classified as unsustainable, is threatening the health of marine ecosystems (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, n.d.). This essay explores how capitalism's push for short-term profit is a danger to long-term sustainability in marine resources and whether a compromise can be found. By exploring the environmental and economic implications of overfishing, it highlights the urgent need for systemic change. It will look at potential paths forward, like stricter international regulations, incentivizing sustainable practices, and promoting equitable resource sharing to reconcile profit-driven motives with the imperative of long-term sustainability. 

When Financial Gains Are at Stake, Do Ecological Concerns Fade?

Overfishing leads to a range of severe environmental consequences, each feeding into the next and amplifying the overall crisis. A primary result is the loss of biodiversity, as overharvesting of key species, especially top predators and essential prey, disrupts food chains and destabilizes marine ecosystems (Jessica, 2025). Overfishing can lead to uncontrolled algae growth, which suffocates coral reefs and destroys vital habitats for marine species. The resilience of marine ecosystems is constantly weakened, leaving them unable to recover from environmental pressures. In addition, the depletion of fish populations impacts the ocean’s ability to sequester carbon, as fewer fish and degraded ecosystems disrupt carbon cycling processes (The Ocean and the Carbon Cycle, n.d.). The destruction of habitats like coral reefs also leaves coastal communities more vulnerable to storms and erosion. These cascading effects do not stop in the ocean; the consequences of overfishing are inescapable - they affect us all, destabilizing food, as well as ecological and human security. 

Commons Without Borders: A Collective Action Problem

Overfishing is primarily driven by the dynamics of the tragedy of the commons, where shared resources like fish stocks are overexploited due to ineffective regulation (Hsu, 2005). This issue is especially acute in unregulated international waters and in national waters where policy enforcement is weak or inconsistent. The lack of binding agreements on catch limits, combined with fragmented governance of global fisheries, has hindered effective regulation, and propagated a vicious cycle of declining yields and intensified competition (Lombard Odier, 2024). As global demand for seafood continues to grow, fueled by expanding markets and population pressures, both individuals and corporations are incentivized to maximize short-term profits, often at the cost of long-term sustainability. The economic consequences of overfishing are also profound, as seen in Indonesia, where declining fish stocks threaten the livelihoods of local fishing communities. As fish become scarcer, communities are forced into increasingly unsustainable practices, reducing already scarce resources further and perpetuating cycles of poverty (Warren & Steenbergen, 2021). The need to venture further and deeper into the ocean to catch fish drives up operational costs, intensifying the financial strain on fishing operations. The destructive economic feedback loop in Indonesia—where the collapse of marine ecosystems leads to greater financial instability shows how overfishing traps communities in a cycle of both ecological and financial decline.

​

The Ethical and Economic Fallout: Who Profits & Who Suffers

​

The overfishing crisis reveals significant ethical concerns tied to profit-driven practices, where multinational corporations (MNCs) and industrial fleets prioritize short-term profit maximization over the long-term health of marine ecosystems and the welfare of vulnerable communities. This dynamic exposes the commodification of shared natural resources, with environmental and social costs being externalized while private actors reap the benefits (Lombard Odier, 2024). Coastal communities in developing nations bear the brunt of the economic and environmental costs, while global profit-driven forces continue to benefit from an unsustainable status quo.

​

Governments are not exempt from this ethical dilemma. Pressured by lobbying groups to support economic growth, they often fail to balance the protection of public goods with the interests of powerful industries. Subsidies to industrial fishing fleets—intended to encourage production—often result in overcapacity, ecological damage, and inequality (Sumaila et al., 2019). The externalities of overfishing, such as biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse, are rarely accounted for in industry practices, leaving society to bear the hidden costs. This dynamic challenges intergenerational equity, as the economic benefits of overfishing today come at the expense of future generations' access to marine resources (Roach, 2006). 

​

Overfishing is a collective action problem, driven by a clash of interests: MNCs and governments seeking short-term profits, while local communities struggle against the ecological drain. Without coordinated international efforts, sustainable outcomes remain elusive, and the ethical, environmental, and economic costs of overfishing will continue to escalate.

​

Conclusion: Which Waters Do We Navigate Next?

​

This tension between economic growth and environmental sustainability is central to the overfishing crisis. While efforts like eco-labeling, sustainable aquaculture, and corporate commitments to sustainable seafood set important precedents, they remain insufficient. True progress requires global collaboration, empowering small fisheries, and greater consumer demand for transparency. Technology, such as AI and blockchain, can optimize practices and ensure traceability, but sustainability must become the industry standard—not the exception—to truly protect our oceans (Ish & Österblom, 2019). Certifications and eco-labels are valuable tools in promoting responsible consumption and incentivizing conservation, but without enforceable regulatory frameworks such as fishing quotas and marine protected areas, their impact remains limited. (Niemietz, 2017). Weak enforcement and political resistance continue to limit the effectiveness of these regulatory measures, leaving gaps that market forces alone struggle to fill. Thus, the future of overfishing hinges on a differentiated approach, where regulation and market-driven solutions work in tandem to address marine conservation (The EU Fisheries Control System Gets a Major Revamp, 2024).

Ultimately, the future of our oceans depends on our ability to find common ground between climate activists, governments, and private industries. The extinction of marine life would not only devastate ecosystems but also destabilize the economies reliant on them. By reframing conservation efforts as long-term economic opportunities, we can incentivize powerful economic actors to reduce their relentless demand for fisheries. Cooperation between all stakeholders will decide whether we achieve a sustainable future or plunge headfirst into the irreversible collapse of our marine ecosystems.

​

References

​

Aqil, A. M. I. (2022, December 23). Overfishing looms as Indonesia struggles to meet fisheries target: Study. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2022/12/23/overfishing-looms-as-indonesia-struggles-to-meet-fisheries-target-study.html

​

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. FAO. https://www.fao.org/iuu-fishing/en/

Hsu, S. (2005). What is a tragedy of the commons? Overfishing and the campaign spending problem. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.668723

Ish, T., & Österblom, H. (2019, May 16). The Rising Tide of Sustainable Seafood. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/sustainable-seafood-industry-action-against-overfishing-by-teresa-ish-and-henrik-osterblom-2019-05

Jessica. (2025, January 22). The devastating domino effect: How overfishing is destroying our oceans. Marine Biodiversity Science Center. https://www.marinebiodiversity.ca/2024/10/the-devastating-domino-effect-how-overfishing-is-destroying-our-oceans/

Kurien, J., & Achari, T. R. T. (1989). On ruining the commons and the commoner: The political economy of overfishing. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/2849

Lombard Odier. (2024, October 16). The economics of overfishing: can we sustainably feed

the world’s appetite for fish? Lombardodier.com.

https://www.lombardodier.com/insights/2024/october/the-economics-of-overfishing-can.html

Niemietz, K. (2017, June 23). Is there a free-market solution to overfishing? Institute of Economic Affairs. https://iea.org.uk/is-there-a-free-market-solution-to-overfishing/

Roach, J. (2006, November 2). Seafood may be gone by 2048, study says. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/seafood-biodiversity

Sumaila, U. R., Ebrahim, N., Schuhbauer, A., Skerritt, D., Li, Y., Kim, H. S., Mallory, T. G., Lam, V. W., & Pauly, D. (2019). Updated estimates and analysis of global fisheries subsidies. Marine Policy, 109, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103695

The EU fisheries control system gets a major revamp. (2024, January 9). Oceans and Fisheries. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-fisheries-control-system-gets-major-revamp-2024-01-09_en

The ocean and the carbon cycle. (n.d.). Science Learning Hub. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/689-the-ocean-and-the-carbon-cycle

Warren, C., & Steenbergen, D. J. (2021). Fisheries decline, local livelihoods and conflicted governance: An Indonesian case. Ocean & Coastal Management, 202, 105498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105498

World Wildlife Fund. (2024). Overfishing. World Wildlife Fund. https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/overfishing